Meiselman v. Eberstadt
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Seitz, Chancellor:
Plaintiff, a stockholder of Chemical Fund, Inc. (“Fund”), brings this derivative action for an accounting on its behalf. The defendants, in addition to the directors of Fund, are F. Eberstadt & Co., Inc. (“Company”), which provides Fund with investment advisory services and acts as principal underwriter and distributor of its shares, and F. Eberstadt and Company (“Investment Company”), an investment banking partnership, whose members own all the stock of Company. The affiliated directors of Fund are partners of the Investment Company.
At the close of the testimony the court…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Saxe v. BradyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
- Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Wilderman v. WildermanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
- Meiselman v. EberstadtCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.