Legal Opinion

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2002No. 02-15070PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge.

In a question of first impression' with respect to the European Community, we must determine the scope and reach of 28 U.S.C. § 1782, 1 which permits domestic discovery for usé in foreign proceedings. We face two questions': (1) whether the proceeding for which discovery is sought qualifies as “foreign or international tribunal”; and (2) if so, whether Section 1782 requires a showing that the- information sought would be discoverable or admissible in that proceeding. Because we conclude that the proceeding for which the discovery at issue is sought…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Request for Assistance From Ministry of Legal Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago Petition of Joseph AzarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re Letters Rogatory From the Tokyo District, Tokyo, JapanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. In Re APPLICATION OFCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. No. 97-5047Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. In The Matter Of The Application Of Malev Hungarian Airlines, PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. In Re Premises Located at 840 140th Ave. NeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Ilyas Khrapunov v. Pavel ProsyankinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Four Pillars Enterprises Co., Ltd v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Timothy YazzieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API