Legal Opinion
United States v. Crawford
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided February 14, 1979No. 77-30343-NA-CR, 77-30355-NA-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MORTON, Chief Judge.
Movants in these two criminal cases, Robert L. Crawford and James Holden, have filed motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 requesting, this court to correct sentences that it previously imposed upon them. Each movant alleges that respondent, through the Bureau of Prisons, has failed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3568, to give him certain “credit toward service of his sentence for [time] spent in custody in connection with the offense or acts for which sentence was imposed.” Because these cases involve identical issues, the court heard argument in both cases at the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Earl Ellery Wright v. United States Board of Parole and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coleman v. U.S. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- United States v. HodgeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- Collins v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984
- Derrick Howard v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026