Legal Opinion

Wright v. Killian

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1901No. L.A. No. 946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Frank F. Oster, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN,C.

—Action to quiet title to certain four mining claims, and for an injunction. Plaintiff had judgment. The appeal is from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.

The verified complaint alleged ownership and right of possession of the mining locations in question for more than five years prior thereto; that defendants entered upon the property on January 1, 1899, and thereafter extracted and are now extracting ore therefrom, and that they claim some interest in and to the said mining locations. Defendants answered, denying the ownership of plaintiff “ at the commencement of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. BrosseauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCulloch v. MurphyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1903
  2. Kinsley v. New Vulture Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Fredricks v. KlauserOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Gear v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API