Legal Opinion

Roth v. Reagen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 13, 1988No. 87-263PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

In his mandamus and declaratory judgment action against Michael V. Reagen, Commissioner of the Iowa Department of Human Services, Larry Roth alleged that Iowa Code section 235A.18(2) (1987) violated his rights of due process, privacy, and equal protection. The challenged provision of that statute requires the department to keep records of unfounded child abuse accusations for six months.

Roth maintains his summary judgment motion, and not the commissioner’s, should have been granted. In his motion Roth asserted his constitutional rights were violated as a matter of law when…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PflibsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. State v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Rush v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harden v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  2. Christensen v. Iowa District Court for Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Bennett v. City of RedfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. In re M.T.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API