Legal Opinion

John v. Holmes and Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation v. Jay Eddy, Harris, Upham & Company, John Doe, Martin v. Miller, Thomas W. Rae,m. David Hyman, Walter C. Johnson, William Lucius Cary, and United Statessecurities and Exchange Commission, John v. Holmes, Durward E. Willis, Solo Tire Company, Hydramotive Corporation, Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation, Hydramotive Engineering Corporation Etal. v. United States of America, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, William Lucius Cary, Manuel F. Cohen, Thomas W. Rae, Martin v. Miller

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1965No. 9543Published

1Opinion of the Court

341 F.2d 477

John V. HOLMES and Hydramotive Manufacturing Corporation, Appellants,

v.

Jay EDDY, Harris, Upham & Company, John Doe, Martin V.

Miller, Thomas W. Rae,M. David Hyman, Walter C.

Johnson, William Lucius Cary, and United

StatesSecurities and Exchange

Commission, Appellees.

John V. HOLMES, Durward E. Willis, Solo Tire Company,

Hydramotive Corporation, Hydramotive Manufacturing

Corporation, Hydramotive Engineering

Corporation etal., Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, United States Securities and

Exchange Commission, William Lucius Cary, Manuel

F. Cohen, Thomas W. Rae, Martin V.

Miller et al.,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  5. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API