Legal Opinion
Hunziker v. State
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided July 27, 1994No. 93-302PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the district court properly concluded as a matter of law that the plaintiffs were not entitled to compensation on a regulatory taking theory for land they own. We think the district court was correct and we affirm.
The plaintiffs — Erben A. Hunziker, Donald M. Furman, R. Friedrich and Sons, Inc., and Buck Construction Company, Inc. — are land developers. In May 1988 they purchased a fifty-nine acre tract of farm land to develop. The plaintiffs platted the tract as the Second Addition, Northridge Parkway Subdivision.
In May 1990 the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Phelps v. Board of Supervisors of Cty. of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Iowa Coal Mining Co. v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Perkins v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Board of Water Works Trustees of the City of Des Moines, Iowa v. Sac County Board of Supervisors, as Trustee of Drainage Districts 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and Calhoun County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 2 and 51 and Buena Vista County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 19Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Shriver v. City of OkobojiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Soon Duck Kim v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.