Legal Opinion
West v. Secretary of the Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 20, 2000No. 97-36118PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge THOMAS.
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Arthur S. West appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his claims challenging the Federal Highway Administration’s (“FHWA”) decision to categorically exclude a two-stage highway interchange project from review under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4332. The district court determined that the FHWA’s decision to proceed using a documented categorical exclusion was not arbitrary and capricious. We have jurisdiction pursuant to. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand.
I. BACKGROUND
In…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cantrell v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cantrell v. City Of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Florida Keys Citizens Coalition, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- RB Jai Alai, LLC v. Secretary of the Florida Department of TransportationDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Arthur S. West v. Secretary Of The Department Of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000