In Re Jong Hee Kang
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MORRIS STERN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtor moves to dismiss her Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, arguing the mechanics of the filing process were flawed in that she assumes she did not comply with § 109(h) and § 521 of the Bankruptcy Code; that is, Ms. Kang claims to have never received that credit counseling which is reflected in a November 28, 2011 credit counseling certificate. 1 In a long, very articulate certification (“Kang Cert.”) (docket entry 36) Ms. Kang, who states that she cannot read or write English (Kang Cert. ¶ 34), laid much of her current dilemma at the feet of her prior…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Turpen v. Eide (In Re Turpen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Segarra-Miranda v. Acosta-Rivera (In Re Acosta-Rivera)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Matter of WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re OsborneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Pinnick v. No (In re Pinnick)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Koger v. UsorohUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025