Legal Opinion

In Re Jong Hee Kang

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 27, 2012No. 19-12111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRIS STERN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Debtor moves to dismiss her Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, arguing the mechanics of the filing process were flawed in that she assumes she did not comply with § 109(h) and § 521 of the Bankruptcy Code; that is, Ms. Kang claims to have never received that credit counseling which is reflected in a November 28, 2011 credit counseling certificate. 1 In a long, very articulate certification (“Kang Cert.”) (docket entry 36) Ms. Kang, who states that she cannot read or write English (Kang Cert. ¶ 34), laid much of her current dilemma at the feet of her prior…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Turpen v. Eide (In Re Turpen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  4. Segarra-Miranda v. Acosta-Rivera (In Re Acosta-Rivera)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. Matter of WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re OsborneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Pinnick v. No (In re Pinnick)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Koger v. UsorohUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API