Legal Opinion

Ayala v. Boss

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wallace R. Cotton, J.

A defendant in a personal injury action who is confronted with a court order directing an inquest against him to assess the plaintiff’s damages, may, upon timely application, conduct a physical examination of the plaintiff, demand medical authorizations and a bill of particulars limited to the issue of damages.

The defendant, duly served by the plaintiffs with a summons and complaint in the instant personal injury action, neglected to interpose a timely answer and, accordingly, the plaintiffs elected to hold him in default. The plaintiffs thereafter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Thompson v. . HalbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Emery v. . BaltzNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Foster v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  5. Charles F. Winson Gems, Inc. v. D. Gumbiner, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Otto v. OttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Santiago v. SiegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Yeboah v. Gaines Service LeasingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Singh v. FriedsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API