Ayala v. Boss
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wallace R. Cotton, J.
A defendant in a personal injury action who is confronted with a court order directing an inquest against him to assess the plaintiff’s damages, may, upon timely application, conduct a physical examination of the plaintiff, demand medical authorizations and a bill of particulars limited to the issue of damages.
The defendant, duly served by the plaintiffs with a summons and complaint in the instant personal injury action, neglected to interpose a timely answer and, accordingly, the plaintiffs elected to hold him in default. The plaintiffs thereafter…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Thompson v. . HalbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Emery v. . BaltzNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Foster v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- Charles F. Winson Gems, Inc. v. D. Gumbiner, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Otto v. OttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Santiago v. SiegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Yeboah v. Gaines Service LeasingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Singh v. FriedsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007