Legal Opinion
Kaneisha Bird; O.M. (a minor) v. United States of America, acting by and through the Bureau of Indian Affairs
District Court, D. Montana
Decided February 10, 2026No. 1:23-cv-00148Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION KANEISHA BIRD; O.M. (a minor), CV 23-148-BLG-SPW-TJC Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND vs. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MAGISTRATE JUDGE acting by and through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Defendant. Plaintiffs Kaneisha Bird and her son O.M. (“Plaintiffs”) bring this action against the United States alleging claims for negligence, negligence per se, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The case arises from an incident wherein O.M. was struck by a vehicle driven by a Bureau of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.