Legal Opinion

Sedlaczek v. de Dreuzy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 6, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

„ The submitted controversy requires the construction of a will. The plaintiff is a granddaughter of the testatrix, the only surviving child of one of her daughters. The three defendants are children of another daughter. The plaintiff, as descendant of one of the children of the testatrix, claims to be entitled to one-half of the trust fund here involved. The defendants, on the other hand, assert that she is entitled to only three-eighths thereof, and that they are entitled to five-eighths. Concededly the rights of the parties depend upon the interpretation of a single clause contained in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BuechnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Cammann v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LeonardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of CorliesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. In re the Estate of HowellsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. In re the Estate of DenariNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Estate of InnerfieldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API