Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Sheindelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The answer denies that the deed from Sheindelman and Parshelsky to Samuel Palley has been lost or destroyed. The loss or destruction of the instrument is an essential fact, to be pleaded as part of plaintiff’s cause of action. This denial, therefore, prevents judgment being taken on the pleadings. The complaint seems to be brought under section 1638 of the Code of Civil Procedure, although an action to compel defendants to execute a new deed might be maintained under the equity powers of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kent v. . Church of St. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Kirschbaum v. . EschmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldberg v. RandNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API