Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Rand

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

Defendant moves pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action is in equity to compel the defendant to convey to the plaintiff, as executor of the estate of Helen Goldberg, certain real property. It appears that by virute of a deed made, executed and delivered by the defendant, plaintiff’s testate became the sole owner of the property involved herein. However, said deed was never recorded and has been either lost or destroyed.

On a motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kent v. . Church of St. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Susquehanna Steamship Co. v. A. O. Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Clearview Associates, Inc. v. Clearview Gardens First Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  4. Cohen v. SheindelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willow Tex, Inc. v. DimacopoulosNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API