Legal Opinion

DirecTV, Inc. v. Haupert

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 4, 2004No. 04-C-93PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

GOODSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Introduction

DIRECTV, Incorporated (“DIRECTV”) operates a satellite broadcast system to deliver digital television programming to customers throughout the United States. (ComplV 2.). To prevent the unauthorized interception of its signals, DIRECTV has employed various encryption measures at a substantial cost. (Compl.lffl 2-3, 12-22.). DIRECTV claims that Haupert purchased nine satellite signal theft devices from EQ Stuff, an internet based company, and has used or sold a number of those devices.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Lyne Brunt, David Wadinski and John Wittenberg v. Service Employees International Union and Dan IversonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. City of Milwaukee v. SaxbeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Elizabeth Graham Flowers Frankie Dukes v. Tandy Corporation, and William Lee Flowers Martha Floyd GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Jean Pierre Frey v. Bank OneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Cases Filed by DirecTV, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2004
  2. In Re Cases Filed by Directv, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API