Wallace v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
(after stating the facts). There is some confusion in the record as to whether or not the election commissioners posted the printed instructions to the voters as required by law, and whether or not they complied with the law in some other respects. We may group these objections to the election under one heading. We all agree that these alleged irregularities did. not invalidate the election, hut come within the principles decided in Wheat v. Smith, 50 Ark. 266, and Hogins v. Bullock, 92 Ark. 67.
' In the case first cited the court recognized that the time of holding an election, whether…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Merwin v. FussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Hogins v. BullockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
3Cited by13 opinions
- Whitaker v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- State v. FlorianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Goggin v. RatchfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Cisco v. Caudle, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Missouri Pacific R.R. Co. v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.