Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jones v. Curtiss

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1944No. 29070Published

1DissentBeals, J.

(dissenting) — The facts are stated in the majority opinion, which also includes the pertinent portions of the HOLC rules and regulations. A considerable portion of the statement of facts is composed of testimony and discussion between court and counsel concerning matters not relevant to this appeal. Only three witnesses testified — appellant L. M. Jones (to whom I shall refer as appellant), respondent L. W. Curtiss, and a representative of the title insurance company which had acted as holder of the escrow. As stated by the majority, no agent or representative of the HOLC testified, and no…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bellingham Securities Syndicate, Inc. v. Bellingham Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Cook v. DonnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Federal Land Bank v. KoslofskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Jessewich v. AbbeneCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API