State v. Martin.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
This case comes to the writer on reassignment. An opinion was written by Cooley, C., which failed of adoption by the .court on a divided vote on a question of law. We have concluded he was right in his conclusions and shall use his statement of the facts.
The appellant, George Martin, and Joe Arvin and Harold Johnson were charged by information in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County with felonious assault with intent to maim Lloyd DeCasnett. A severance was granted and appellant Martin, whom we shall call defendant, was tried alone. He was convicted, sentenced to two years’ imprisonment in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LaytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- State v. MulhallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- State v. WansongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Ashley v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. WhalenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- State v. SelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- People v. CzaharaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.