Legal Opinion

People v. Pina

California Superior Court

Decided June 22, 2017No. BR 053105Published

1Opinion of the CourtRicciardulli, J.

*3INTRODUCTION

We hold here Vehicle Code section 22520.5, subdivision (a), which makes it a crime to "solicit, display, sell, offer for sale, or otherwise vend or attempt to vend any merchandise or service" in designated locations on and near freeway on-ramps and off-ramps, does not prohibit begging or panhandling.

Defendant Vincent Pina appeals the judgment following his conviction of violating Vehicle Code section 22520.5, subdivision (a), contending there was insufficient evidence presented at trial that he violated the statute. He further contends the statute violated his First Amendment…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. ScheidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. CornettCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. Superior Court (Hartway)California Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API