Legal Opinion
Torrez v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 25, 2004No. 3:03 CV 7106Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is a suit under Ohio law in which the plaintiff, Angel Torrez, seeks actual and punitive damages against defendants DaimlerChrysler Corp. and ESIS, Inc. for their alleged intentional failure to perform their obligations under Ohio’s Workers’ Compensation law. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Pending are defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). For the following reasons, defendants’ motions shall be denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff worked for defendant Daimler-Chrysler from 1979 until his retirement on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.