Flores v. Barricella
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding to determine and enforce an attorney’s lien pursuant to Judiciary Law § 475, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated February 14, 1985, which is in favor of the petitioners and against the appellant in the principal sum of $10,463.83.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
The record indicates that Reich and Reich, P. C., had a charging lien for legal services rendered because it appeared as the attorney of record for Manuel and Maria Flores in their negligence action against Arcangelo Barricella (see, Rodriquez v City of New York, 66 NY2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Teichner v. W & J Holsteins, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. KeeffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Rodriguez v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kaplan v. ReussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Matter of Petition of Rosenman & Colin, Appellee-Cross-Appellant, for an Adjudication of Its Rights in the Matter of Sherrier v. Richard. Rosenman & Colin, Cross-Appellant, Julian Sherrier v. Bernice Richard, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Rosenman & Colin v. RichardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Shalom Toy, Inc. v. Each & Every One of the Members of the New York Property Insurance Underwritting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v. RichardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Grutman Katz Greene & Humphrey v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.