Legal Opinion
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP v. City of Tulsa
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided September 3, 2002No. CIV.A.1:02-CV1038BBMPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARTIN, District Judge.
This case, alleging breach of contract for nonpayment of legal fees, is before the court on the City of Tulsa’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue [Doc. No. 8-1]. In the alternative, the City of Tulsa seeks a transfer of venue to the Northern District of Oklahoma [Doc. No. 8-2].
I. Factual and Procedural Background
This lawsuit arises out of a legal services contract between the defendant, the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma (“Tulsa” or “the City”), and the plaintiff, the Atlanta office of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker (“Paul…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Parker v. Brush Wellman, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Strobehn v. MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- RMS Titanic, Inc. v. ZallerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Canty v. FRY'S ELECTRONICS, INC.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010
- Packard v. Temenos Advisory, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.