State Ex Rel. Portmann v. City Council of Massillon
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
The claim is made that this action, being filed on January 6, 1938, was prematurely instituted because at that time Council of the city of Massillon had not definitely rejected Ordinance No. 3824 which proposed the referendum election upon Ordinance No. 3812. The court might entertain serious doubts as to the propriety of the action at the time it was filed were it not for the admissions contained in the answer filed by the city solicitor on behalf of the council. Contained therein we find this statement:
“Respondents admit that thereafter, upon the dates alleged in the petition, that these…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hinchliffe v. GibbonsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Waltz v. MichellOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Poor v. AddisonOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Didelius v. City CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Council of the Village of MilanOhio Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Tietje v. CollettOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- State ex rel. Janik v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Blackwell v. BachrachOhio Supreme Court · 1957