Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Blackwell v. Bachrach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1957No. 34930Published

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The capacity of relator as a taxpayer to maintain this action was decided by both courts below in relator’s favor, and we believe properly so. Brissel et al., Commrs., v. State, ex rel. McCammon, 87 Ohio St., 154, 100 N. E., 348. See, also, the distinction between the enforcement of private rights and that of public rights as delineated by Longworth, J., in State, ex rel., v. Henderson, 38 Ohio St., 644, 648.

We are also of the opinion that the courts below were correct in holding that relator should not be denied relief for the sole reason that the prayer of his petition seeks an election on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hinchliffe v. GibbonsOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Masters v. BeamerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Waltz v. MichellOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Poor v. AddisonOhio Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API