Legal Opinion

Hamby v. McDaniel

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1977Published

1Opinion of the Court

559 S.W.2d 774 (1977)

Jerry HAMBY et ux., etc., Petitioners,

v.

Gary Wayne McDANIEL et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

December 12, 1977.

Robert A. Scott, Finnell, Thompson, Scott & Logan, Cleveland, for petitioners.

Allen H. Carter, Carter & Reid, Athens, for respondents.

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

Certiorari was granted in this case to reexamine prior judicial interpretations of the Wrongful Death Statute, that a viable fetus suffering tortious injury en ventre sa mere does not come within the intendment of the statute, unless born alive.

The Hambys ask that we extend the scope of the…

Also in this document: Dissent · Henry; Dissent · Brock.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API