Legal Opinion

Walden v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1976No. 9379PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted in a nonjury trial of assault and of possession of a prohibited weapon. 1 On appeal he makes three contentions. First, he argues that the incriminating, statements he made immediately following his arrest should have been suppressed by the trial court as the police allegedly failed to properly advise him of his constitutional rights. 2 Second, he contends that under the facts of this case the assault charge is a lesser included offense of possession of a dangerous weapon and, therefore, his assault conviction must be vacated. Third, he claims…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. Maynard Francis HayesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. Floyd W. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Hawkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API