Legal Opinion

United States v. Kendrick Moody

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2019No. 18-2040; 18-2041PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Kendrick Moody pleaded guilty to having a prohibited object in prison, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1791 (a)(2), on two separate occasions. The district court 1 calculated an advisory Guidelines range of four to ten months' imprisonment for each offense. Moody requested concurrent four-month sentences. The court believed that it lacked authority to impose the sentences concurrently and rejected Moody's alternative suggestion of two consecutive two-month terms before sentencing him to two consecutive four-month terms. Moody appeals, claiming the district court erred in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Setser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. United States v. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Dayven JosephCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Joshua Thorpe, Also Known as Juice, United States of America v. Joshua Thorpe, Also Known as JuiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. TaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Marion Wise, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. United States v. Markell HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Edward Lee SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. David TumeaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  5. United States v. Andre WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API