Legal Opinion

Revells v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided May 7, 2003No. CIV.A.02-S-558-SPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COODY, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Eddie Revells (“Revells”) filed this action in state court against defendants Wassau Insurance Company (‘Was-sau”), Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), and Shaw Management Corporation (“Shaw”) seeking payment of disability benefits pursuant to an employee welfare benefit plan offered through Re-vells’ former employer, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, and administered initially by Wassau and subsequently by MetLife. Specifically, the plaintiff alleges state law claims of breach of contract and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Fortelney v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of BostonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Karns v. Disability Reinsurance Management Services Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API