Legal Opinion

Murden v. Miami Poultry & Egg Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 7, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this case the assignments of error and the briefs of the plaintiff in error present a number of questions which this Court is invited to consider, but we deem it unnecessary to discuss these questions because of the factual condition which is disclosed by the record.

The suit was by the widow of a gentleman who was killed as the result of a Pierce-Arrow automobile coming into collision with the rear end of a Ford truck on Dixie Highway in the early morning before daylight. The driver of the automobile was a witness for plaintiff and the driver of the truck was a witness for the defendant.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Railroad Co. v. GladmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Looney v. Metropolitan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bessett v. HackettSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Booth v. Mary Carter Paint CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Sirmons v. PittmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. White v. HughesSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Busbee v. QuarrierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API