Legal Opinion

Backus v. Coyne

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Superior Court of Detroit.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, J.:

Defendant in error brought an action of assumpsit against plaintiffs in error, copartners, who were doing business under the firm name of Backus Bros., upon a general average claim, which had been assigned to him by John Stewart.

It is first objected that the doctrine of general average cannot be enforced in a court of common law, and Rossiter v. *7Chester, 1 Doug., 154, is relied upon. It was held in that ease that the great lakes of this country were not subject to admiralty jurisdiction. This was really the principal question in that case, and the court held,' as a necessary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rossiter v. ChesterMichigan Supreme Court · 1843
  2. Ortman v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Savercool v. FarwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Dike v. The St. JosephU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1855
  5. Grimes v. BlakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferem v. Olson & MahonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API