Legal Opinion
William J. Kent, III v. Albert C. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 11, 1968No. 32619_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEDINA, Circuit Judge:
We are urged to reverse this judgment for plaintiff because it is claimed that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law, and that it was error to refuse certain of defendant’s requests for instructions. It is also claimed that it was error to receive plaintiff’s testimony concerning his loss of earnings while disabled after the automobile accident that gave rise to the case.
On Sunday, March 6, 1966 in the late afternoon there was the usual exodus of those from New York City and elsewhere who came with their skis to enjoy the Vermont slopes and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Blow and Cote, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Slate v. Hogback Mountain Ski Lift, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Verchereau v. JamesonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
- Welch v. StowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
- Luce v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Dubon-OteroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Gary W. Justice v. John W. Dennis, Individually and in His Official Capacity as North Carolina State Highway PatrolmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Justice v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986