Legal Opinion

McDiarmid v. McDiarmid

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1938No. 24532. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Farthing

The circuit court of Kane county by its decree canceled two deeds as clouds on the title of complainants, granted partition of the land and ordered the appellants to account in accordance with the prayer of the appellees’ amended complaint. Bertha McDiarmid, one of the defendants, and Joseph Ness, have appealed from that decree.

Horatio N. Woodward and wife conveyed the 307 acres in question to Elizabeth McDiarmid, a widow, and her son John R. McDiarmid, husband of Bertha McDiarmid, both of whom are now dead, as tenants in common, by deed dated December 11, 1916. Several years before this,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. BurnsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Larmon v. KnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Whetsler v. SpragueIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Meyers v. KissnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stenwall v. BergstromIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Lipkin v. KorenIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  5. Clayton v. James B. Clow & SonsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API