Legal Opinion
Kittilson v. Ford
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 22, 1979No. 2640-3Published
1Opinion of the Court
23 Wn. App. 402 (1979)
595 P.2d 944
CLOE M. KITTILSON, Appellant,
v.
ROBERT L. FORD, ET AL, Respondents.
No. 2640-3.
The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
May 22, 1979.
Thomas Milby Smith, for appellant.
R. Max Etter, for respondents.
GREEN, C.J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages arising from her purchase of securities from the defendants. Her complaint contains three causes of action based upon (1) a violation of the Securities Act of Washington, RCW 21.20; (2) a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86; and as an alternative to the foregoing causes of action (3)…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Haddenham v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Lane v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.