Skok v. Hoch
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
Plaintiffs matriculated at Bloomsburg State College and were dismissed. Seeking to remedy the alleged injustice, they erroneously filed a Complaint in Mandamus naming the Vice President and Dean as a party defendant.
Lest plaintiffs are unmindful of hornbook law, we repeat: “ ‘Mandamus is an extraordinary writ which lies to compel the performance of a ministerial act or mandatory duty where there is a clear legal right in the plaintiff, a corresponding duty in the defendant, and a want of any other appropriate and adequate remedy. Borough of Easton v. Lehigh…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Travis v. TeterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Verratti v. Ridley TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Goodman Et Ux. v. MeadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Boslover Ahavas Achim Belzer Ass'n v. Philadelphia Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Borough of Easton v. Lehigh Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Porter v. Bloomsburg State CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- VENNERI v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- KREMER v. SHOYERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Fraternal Order of Police v. ShappCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Hazel v. D'IorioCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.