United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal in these cases is from judgments entered in the Supreme Court. That court reduced the assessment for taxation for the year 1922 on fourteen pieces of property of the prosecutors. The properties are located in Jersey City and Hoboken, facing the Hudson river. They are the terminal lands of the prosecutors. In general terms, they are bounded on the east by the Hudson river, on the west by Greene, Provost and Henderson streets. Henderson street runs from Jersey City to Hoboken. On the south by Exchange place, Montgomery street and Second street, in Jersey City. On the north by Perry…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Turnley v. City of ElizabethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Central Railroad v. State Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
- Long Dock Co. v. State Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes & AssessmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Douglass v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
3Cited by12 opinions
- D., L. & WR CO. v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- CPC Int'l, Inc. v. Bor. of Englewood CliffsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- City of Trenton v. John A. Roebling Sons Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Village of Ridgefield Park v. BERGEN CO. BD. OF TAXATIONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- General Motors Corp. v. Linden CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.