Bayley v. Hamburg
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Skagit county, Brawley, J., entered May 8, 1918, upon findings in favor, of tbe defendants, in an action upon a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Some years ago, appellant, then and ever since a resident of Seattle, became tbe owner of a large tract of land in Skagit county, and employed one Fitzgerald, residing in tbe immediate vicinity of tbe land, as bis agent to sell tbe land in parcels, and collect tbe purchase price. Tbe agent was not authorized to sell except at certain list prices, or by submitting offers to appellant for approval, and *178had no authority to sign contracts or deeds, or to discount notes.
About November 25, 1913, Fitzgerald entered into an arrangement with respondents, to whom he had previously sold another tract,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Andrews v. Northwestern National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Land Bank v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Modern Equipment Corp. v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Burke County v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Union Finance Co. v. National Bank in North Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. LynnMontana Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.