Legal Opinion

Naglebaugh v. Harder & Hofer Coal Mining Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1898No. 2,501PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

The only question presented by the record is the action of the court in sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The appellant was plaintiff, and, refusing to amend, judgment was rendered against him for costs.

The complaint is in two paragraphs. In the first it is charged that appellee is a corporation; that it owned and operated a coal mine; that it employed a large number of men in mining coal; that for three years appellee issued to and circulated among its employes brass checks, which represented money due such employes for labor; that said checks were payable at the store .of Patton &…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Deming v. State ex rel. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Griswold v. WaddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  3. Rock v. StingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Case v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Winchester Electric Light Co. v. VealIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. McNay v. Town of LowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Pere Marquette Railroad v. BaertzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Miller v. Travelers' InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. Marks v. Conrad Seipp Brewing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API