Chandler v. Home Loan Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The certificate shows the appeal was taken by the complainants under the provisions of General Acts 1911, p. 589. There was acceptance of citation by cocom-plainant Ollie Jarrett, who “unites in this appeal,” and separately assigns error. Hence all the parties in interest are before this court. L. & N. R. Co. v. Shikle, 206 Ala. 494, 90 South. 900.
Where the averments of the bill are admitted in answer, proof thereof is dispensed with; that is, the whole answer will be looked to by the court for the denials as well as the admissions. Sims Ch. Pr. § 498; Tait v. American, etc., Co., 132 Ala.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Andrews v. GreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Winsett v. WinsettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. ShikleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Ray v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Snodgrass v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Williams v. AnthonySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Shaddix v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Lynne v. GurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.