Legal Opinion

Foster v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1996PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

We are called upon to examine the propriety of certain actions undertaken by the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the capacity of Rehabilitator (“Insurance Commissioner” or “Rehabilitator”) of the estate of the insolvent Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Insurance Company (“Mutual Fire”). The intricate facts surrounding Mutual Fire’s insolvency and many of the related circumstances have been fully detailed and exhaustively discussed in Foster v. Mutual Fire, Marine and Inland Ins. Co., 531 Pa. 598, 614 A.2d 1086 (1992), cert. denied, 506…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Mining Ass'n v. Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Clark v. TroutmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Curran v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Koken v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Koken v. SteinbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Ario v. Ingram Micro, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. R/S FINANCIAL CORP. v. KovalchickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API