Legal Opinion

Kaitlin v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1949No. 757PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

In June 1945 the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company issued a $2500 policy of insurance on the life of Solomon Kaitlin. On February 15, 1947, before the policy had reached the two-year incontestable period, Mr. Kaitlin died. The company refusing to pay, Naomi Kaitlin, widow of the insured and beneficiary under the policy, brought suit thereon. The trial court directed a verdict against her and she appeals.

In the application for insurance there were these questions: “Have you ever been treated for, or told that you had, -high blood pressure? Have you ever had any ailment or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Kaplan v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Penman v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roy Louis Jannenga v. Nationwide Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  2. Leola Blair v. The Prudential Insurance Co. Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Hill v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Haubner v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Skinner v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API