Kaufman v. Anker
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We note that respondents do not here assert "an unfettered right to terminate the employment of a teacher during his probationary period, unless the teacher establishes that the [chancellor] terminated for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory proscription” (James v Board of Rduc., 37 NY2d 891, 892). In this circumstance the proper standard for judicial review of the action of the Chancellor of Schools of the New York City School District in terminating appellant’s appointment as a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- James v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by17 opinions
- Frasier v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Storman v. New York City Department of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Von Gizycki v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Matter of Halcomb v. New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Orshan v. AnkerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.