Building Investments, Inc. v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
The allegations of the petition show the plaintiff occupied the status of an invitee on the defendant’s premises and that the defendant failed to exercise ordinary care to keep the premises safe for her use. Southern Ry. Co. v. Howard, 9 Ga. App. 264 (70 S. E. 1124); Coffer v. Bradshaw, 46 Ga. App. 143 (6) (167 S. E. 119); Smith v. Jewell Cotton Mill Co., 29 Ga. App. 461 (116 S. E. 17). The petition did not disclose, as contended by the defendant, a failure of the plaintiff on the occasion of her injury to exercise ordinary care. The allegation that water blending in color…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Rogers v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Smith v. Jewell Cotton Mill Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Alford v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hicks v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963