Legal Opinion

Smith v. Jewell Cotton Mill Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1923No. 13537PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Action for damages; from , Warren superior court — Judge Shurley. April 4-, 1922. Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

The petition for damages is not based upon any wilful or wanton conduct of the defendant toward the deceased as a trespasser, or as a mere licensee upon the defendant’s premises, but is based upon its failure to exercise ordinary care and diligence in keeping the premises safe for the deceased, who at the time of the injury was waiting as a customer for his cotton to be ginned by the defendant ginnery, and while warming in the boiler room on a cold and chilly morning was fatally scalded by an explosion of the boiler through alleged negligence of the defendant. The court sustained a general…

2Cited by34 opinions

  1. Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Loney v. Laramie Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  5. McCall v. McCallieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API