People v. Burch
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial after a judgment of guilty of violating (a) subdivision 1 of section 337a of the Penal Code (poolselling and bookmaldng) and (b) subdivision 6 of section 337a of the Penal Code (accepting a bet) following trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals.
Viewing the evidence as we must in the light most favorable to the People (respondent) the record discloses that on May 30, 1952, two Los Angeles police officers observed defendant in front of a barbershop conversing with two men and consulting a newspaper. Shortly after the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Spies v. RosenstockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Matter of RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Board of Commissioners v. GrodeckiPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1943
- People v. "Laude", New York County Courts1913
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. CudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. ChaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. RaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. MaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.