Legal Opinion

Graham v. Onderdonk

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 24, 1960PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burling, J.

Appellants, judgment creditors of C. Herbert Onderdonk, brought suit against Grace Onderdonk, the respondent in this appeal. The purpose of the litigation was to set aside a deed from C. Herbert Onderdonk, husband of the respondent, to Grace Onderdonk, which deed was dated Hovember 16, 1956 and recorded December 17, 1956. The transfer, which concerned property located in the Borough of Bernardsville, Somerset County, New Jersey, allegedly had been made in fraud of creditors.

The suit was transferred from the Superior Court, Law Division, on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brod v. BrodIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Kane v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Nussbacher v. ManderfeldWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Greenly v. GreenlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Abeles v. Adams Engineering Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. Pemaquid Underwriting Brokerage, Inc. v. D & H Alternative Risk Solutions, Inc. (In Re Pemaquid Underwriting Brokerage, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  4. Minardi v. NocitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Trotta v. TrottaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API