Legal Opinion

Neil v. Agris

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 18, 1985No. C14-84-839-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered against appellant in a suit on an account stated. In three points of error, appellant asserts there is no evidence of 1) a prior transaction by which appellant became indebted to appellee; 2) any agreement, express or implied, fixing the amount for the services; or 3) a promise, express or implied, to pay for the services. We reverse and render.

Suit was filed on a sworn account and, alternatively, account stated. The money allegedly due appellee resulted from professional services rendered by him to appellant following…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. H. G. Berning, Inc. v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Eastern Development & Investment Corp. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dulong v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  2. Eaves v. Unifund CCR Partners, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
  3. McFarland v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  4. Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Benderson-Wainberg Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Best Buy Stores, L.P. v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API