Legal Opinion

West Chicago St. R. R. v. Stoltzenfeldt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill to Set Aside a Judgment.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears

It is contended by the learned counsel for appellant that a court of chancery has no jurisdiction here to grant a new trial in an action at law, and therefore that the decree is here erroneous. In this behalf the decision of this court in Mechanics M. Bank v. Colehour, 44 Ill. App. 470, is cited and relied upon. The decision is not controlling of this case. It goes only to the extent of holding that a court of chancery has not in general, jurisdiction to direct a court of law what it shall do. But it does not hold that a court of chancery may not enjoin a party to a suit at law, or to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. NeelyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Wilday v. McConnelIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Foote v. DespainIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Chambers v. RoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Lieserowitz v. West Chicago St. R. R.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Stock & Grain Exchange v. Pine Tree Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  2. Alleanza Italiana v. PapaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API