Lieserowitz v. West Chicago St. R. R.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for' defendant. Error by plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
This was an action by plaintiff in error against defendant in error, by Louis Lieserowitz, her next friend. The declaration contains but one count, which, after alleging that the defendant owned and operated certain lines of street railway on State street, Randolph street and other streets in the city of Chicago, with cars thereon drawn by horses, proceeds as follows:
“ Plaintiff with all care and diligence was upon one of said defendant’s cars on South Halsted street as a passenger to be safely carried to her place of destination. On said day plaintiff was with all care and diligence upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daingerfield v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Taggart v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Wilday v. McConnelIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Holmes v. StatelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R. Co. v. ElderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cloud v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- West Chicago St. R. R. v. StoltzenfeldtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Cloud v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946