Veith v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8353 (T. D. 38447). [Oral argument Nov. 4,1920, by Mr. Place and Mr. Hanson.]
1Opinion of the Court
De Yrxes, -Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court:
The contested issues presented by this appeal are represented by six samples, of sets of samples, designated in the record as Exhibits Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4,. 5, and 8. A stipulation filed herein consents to an affirmance of the board’s decision as to all of these importations represented by Exhibits Nos. 6 and 7. They were held by the Board of General Appraisers to be properly dutiable as “manufactures in chief value of beads” under paragraph 333, current tariff act, and by consent that part of the board's decision is affirmed.
The goods are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fenton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Dingelstedt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Crimmins v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Saji & Kariya Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Cross Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jensen v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Protest 922378-G of Irving W. Rice Co.United States Customs Court · 1938
- American Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Plant Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956