City of Beatrice v. Meints
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 558 289 NEBRASKA REPORTS was entitled to absolute immunity for conduct within the scope of his role in the juvenile proceedings. It correctly dismissed the six employees in their individual capacities because the plaintiffs’ claims against them were barred by the statute of limitations. The remaining 12 DHHS employees sued by the plaintiffs were not parties to this action. Therefore, there are no defendants remaining in the lawsuit that could be found liable to the plaintiffs. As such, we do not need to address the remaining assignments of error. VI. CONCLUSION For the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.